RSS Feed
� December 4, 2006 - 7/7 bus PSYOPS progress
I'm convinced that there is proof in these images from terrorize.dk. I've looked at them earlier here, here, here and here. There's all sorts of nonsense going on in these images e.g. the body slung over the shoulder in the image above. There are riot-police with dogs all over this image. I'm sure that other images show guns and rifles aimed at people. The first image shows retreival of a cone shape that I suspect is the nose-cone of a missile. Many of the images show that the bus's stairway is blocked with what appears to be the back seat of the bus so that the explosion was anticipated and therefore could not have been the work of a suicide bomber.
The bus 'bombing' cast the earlier tube explosions of 7 July 2005 as terrorist attacks and suicide bombings. If it is accepted that these images destroy the claim that the bus explosion was a suicide bombing then the whole story of suicide bombers on 7 July 2005 is demolished. There were no bombs. There were no suicide bombers. Senior politicians and policemen should be held to account under anti-terrorism laws.
These images have been in the public domain for some considerable time so that news agencies with superior image analysis capabilities have already seen them and stayed silent. Please don't wait for me.
Tony Blair's government decreed immunity from arrest and prosecution through the privy council for those attending the G8 meetings. It is likely that he did this to facilitate the fake manufactured terrorism of 7 July 2005 that killed 57 and injured many hundreds. If this is correct, then it is certainly treason although his favourite ***** calls it the biggest act of mass murder ...
My research leads to the conclusion that the Metropolitan Police have been using special forces soldiers amoung their armed police. This would mean that those armed police could not be investigated since special forces are above the law.
The 210 act points in a certain obvious direction which may be mistaken. We have seen this style of signiature before (in the comments) and certain groups appear to have shown that they want no further involvement.
|
|
|
