Latest news from the derenged, dangerous and deluded world of Planet Blair. Even unborn children will not escape Blair and New Labour's Fascism.
We have established that abandoning the need for evidence seems to be one of those values that New Labour is championing in the "battle of values". Deranged and deluded mentalist Blair has announced that even unborn children would not escape UK's New Fascist Order where evidence of crimes - and even crimes themselves are not necessary - for them to be punished.
His initiative could mean that families who refuse to co-operate would lose state benefits or have their children taken into local authority care more swiftly.
The Prime Minister said it was possible to predict problem children "prebirth" in some cases. He suggested that single mothers might be forced to accept state help before their children were born under the plans to tackle a hard core of more than one million "socially excluded" people. ...
"For us as a party and a government, this is something we are passionate about, that we have developed for a number of years and will continue long after I've gone," he said. [from the Independent]
He hates children. Doesn't he?
Which children are to be attacked by Labour's Fascist State?
This question provides a real insight into Planet Blair Fascism. Blair gives the example of a possibly still prenant teenage mother outside of a stable relationship. Yes, that seems like the typical poor, weak, defenceless and vulnerable victim that New Labour attacks. But we can do better than that.
David 'shagger of other men's wives' Blunkett announced two plans to attack asylum seekers' children while he was Home Secretary. There was the claim that asylum seekers' children were "swamping" schools and the plan to kidnap failed asylum seekers' children so that they could be blackmailed. Poor, weak, defenceless and vulnerable victims again. But we can do better still.
We learn that the Facist Labour "Government plans to exclude details of celebrities' children from a new national child database".
Looking at the 'totality' of Blair & Co's attacks on children, we can build the profile of the typical victim as poor, weak, defenceless and vulnerable and not the children of celebrities. Single mothers and asylum seekers are an undercass while celebrity - involving that huge motivation for Narcissist Blair, mass adoration - bestows a special honoured status. While Bunkett's "swamping" remark is also racist, asylum seekers' children are also far more likely to be non-Christian. Is religious fruitcase Bliar attacking children that will not be Christened? Is it because no Christening is arranged that the paranoid-deluded nutter knows that they'll be baduns even before they are born?
And how exactly will these poor, weak, defenceless and vulnerable children be helped through having benefits stopped?
|
