RSS Feed
� May 1, 2006 - THE UNOFFICIAL NARRATIVE: How we know they are hunting deep
We can establish that they are hunting deep through analysis of how closely deep's story fits the Jerusalem Post documents and how closely deep's 'profile' fits the three 'suspected terrorists' that we know were pursued by the police or killed by special forces. The problem for the Blair government and the Metropolitan Police concerning the Jerusalem Post articles is that since they followed them so closely, it would be difficult to accept that they did not follow them by "go[ing] deeper". There is also the problem for the government that they are Zionist Neo-Conservatives so that they have consistently sucked-up to the Zionints e.g. alignment with US Neo-Cons, pursuing an illegal war of aggression for Israeli interests, the Jack Straw and Condoleeza Rice affairs and the Gen. Almog affair. de Menezes killing will not be investigated There's a further problem for the government is the stench around them concerning the extra-judicial execution of Jean Charles de Menezes. Even according to the seriously-discredited official cover-up, special forces were involved. Blair & Co have been very busy introducing special forces into civilian life in the UK for that classic Fascist New Labour reason - to evade accountability for their actions. Special forces are under the control of the Directorate of Special Forces. The Independent Police Complaints Commission is only concerned with complaints against the police. UK's special forces are the government's private army that will not be subjected to investigation, even for cold-blooded murder which has been clearly shown to be illegal under UK law (death on the Rock case). Any operation to conduct a political assassination like the killing of de Menezes (mistaken for deep) would be cleared by Blair & Co. The day previous to de Menezes' murder London experienced a terror alert and a COBRA meeting was held. At that meeting would have been Prime Minister Tony Blair, Home Secretary Charles Clarke, Minister for War Jack Straw [correction: John Reid is Minister for War, Straw is Foreign Secretary], Metroplitan Police boss Ian Blair and the Director of Special Forces. It is at the COBRA meeting that the orders and authority to conduct a 'surgical strike' would have been given, thereby implicating the government ministers.Three 'suspected terrorists' The three 'suspected terrorists' that we are aware of are Jean Charles de Menezes, Rizwan 'Riz' Ahmed and David Mery (website). Although they are not identical they are certainly similar enough to match a police description or a poor photo. David Mery's case is revealing. They thought they had deep there, just a week after killing de Menezes. He was actively anti-war, had previously edited a magazine and a geek that had used usenet. Notice that his photos at http://gizmonaut.net/bits/notowar/notowar.html exclude the 20 Nov 2003 march and rally to 'unwelcome' Dubya. I wonder if he was out of the country? The basics of THE UNOFFICIAL NARRATIVE have been presented. More later. Much of this is in the public domain and open to research. Comments are disabled due to malicious commentingThe following comments appeared at this post NB David Mery has a good blog� May 15, 2006 - David MeryPosted by dizzy I've tried contacting David Mery and put him in the meta-tags to try to attract his attention. Could somebody point him to this blog? The questions I have for David Mery are Does he have any evidence that they were after deep e.g. on the interview tape, did they ask him about posting on usenet? Did the police ask him about the 20 Nov 2003 demo? Assuming that he was not on that demo, how did he satisfy the police that he was elsewhere? Were thay particularly thorough about establishing his identity e.g. by refusing to accept documents as genuine, insisting on many forms of identification or even insising that he related his entire life history before they were satisfied? Did they ask him about G8, his views on G8 and whether he attended any G8 demonstrations? Did they ask him about Bristol or Bristol Indymedia? Permanent Link � May 18, 2006 - No conspiracyPosted by David Mery > Does he have any evidence that they were after deep e.g. on the interview tape, did they ask him about posting on usenet? No. > Did the police ask him about the 20 Nov 2003 demo? No. > Assuming that he was not on that demo, how did he satisfy the police that he was elsewhere? I was not there. > Were thay particularly thorough about establishing his identity e.g. by refusing to accept documents as genuine, insisting on many forms of identification or even insising that he related his entire life history before they were satisfied? By the time I was interviewed they had some reseach as they knew all the addresses I had lived at for instance. > Did they ask him about G8, his views on G8 and whether he attended any G8 demonstrations? No. > Did they ask him about Bristol or Bristol Indymedia? No. Permanent Link � May 18, 2006 - Thanks DavidPosted by dizzy Thanks David. I'm sorry to drag you into this, but I do think that it is part of it. regards, dizzy
|
|
|
