Thkis blog was mysteriously deleted in December 2008. A deleted article is republished below.
� June 25, 2008 - 77: There were no explosives
source 7/7: The final Judgement? In the end, there was no murder weapon.
If the prosecution keeps changing its mind over what the weapon is
supposed to have been, and if its story becomes more unlikely every
time, then we are entitled to conclude that the case is unsound � or
even worse, that it has somehow been fabricated. There are three
different locations where the explosive used or found has to be
concordant: London (four different sites), Luton (in a car in the
Thameslink car-park) and Leeds (bath of 18, Alexander Grove). A
concordant story must have recognisably the same substance present in
the latter two, and that same stuff must have exploded in the first. If
it cannot do that, then there is no case. Phase 1: High Explosive On 9th July, the police announced that � High explosives were used in the attacks and were not home-made.� Likewise,
on 11th July: �All we are saying is that it is high explosives,"
Scotland Yard Deputy Assistant Commissioner Brian Paddick told a news
conference on Saturday. "That would tend to suggest that it is not
home-made explosive. � Advanced bombs were so powerful that none of
dead have been identified, World Tribune. http://z13.invisionfree.com/julyseventh/index.php?showtopic=69&st=7 Advanced and powerful bombs had been used, not home-made. Then on 13th July it was stated that these were of �C4� explosive: London explosives have military origin - Science Daily. LONDON, July 13 (UPI) -- | Quote: | Scotland
Yard has asked for European cooperation in finding how last week's
London subway and bus bombers obtained military plastic explosives.
Traces of the explosive known as C4 were found at all four blast sites,
and The Times of London said Scotland Yard considers it vital to
determine if they were part of a terrorist stockpile. C4 is
manufactured mostly in the United States, and is more deadly and
efficient than commercial varieties. It is easy to hide, stable, and is
often missed by traditional bomb-sniffing detection systems, the
newspaper said. Forensic scientists told the newspaper the construction
of the four devices detonated in London was very technically advanced,
and unlike any instructions that can be found on the Internet. |
Phase II: Brewed in the Bath
On July 17th 2005, The Observer
reported that 22 lbs of tri-acetone tri-peroxide had been found in the
bath of 18, Alexander Grove, Leeds. How much hydrogen peroxide etc
would have been required to make this, and why would they leave behind
so huge a quantity? How or where did they obtain the 70% concentration
that would be required? Jane�s Terrorism & Insurgency Centre� on
22nd July averred that �preliminary forensic testing� both at the
London bomb sites and at the Leeds property� was pointing to TATP. This
was it explained �a powerful homemade explosive.�
Photographs of the material present in the Luton car-park appeared on
26th of July 2005, kindly given by ABC News in America. It showed white
explosive material. By this time TATP (tri-acetone tri-peroxide) was
being hyped as the explosive. The TATP story did have the disadvantage
that its detonation does not produce heat or light, whereas these were
clearly evident to survivor-witnesses of this event.
Phase III: Black Pepper
Photographs of the material present in the bath at Alexander Grove were shown in The Sun, 14 April 2008. It showed black explosive material, viz. black pepper. At Kingston, | Quote: | | The
jury, who were shown pictures from inside the flat, heard that
containers of a mixture of black pepper and hydrogen peroxide, used as
the main charge, were found sitting in the bath�. Empty bags of ground
black pepper were found along with ice-cube bags and ice packs in the
kitchen, |
Black pepper and peroxide, mixed together, will not really explode. The
mixture would do much the same as the Chapati-flour bombs of the 21/7
crew, i.e. just go phut. That twist of the story at the Kingston trial
argues for the innocence of the four suspects. At no stage of this 70m
enquiry �Operation Theseus� were the public shown any authenticated
forensic reports of chemical analysis, of explosive material left at
these sites. That suggests a fictional story is here unfolding. Whereas
something did indeed rip apart three tube coaches, so terribly that
no-one was allowed to view the ruins and they had to be destroyed in
secret one year after the event.
Conclusion
Now that this Kingston trial is over, the story can hardly develop any
further. We conclude, that the incoherence of accounts of the
murder-weapon mean that the conjecture of Islamic guilt has now to be
abandoned. The incoherence is evident both in the way the alleged
explosive kept changing, and in the way the several different locations
had different stories attached to them.
The
four young men never had the faintest interest in chemistry, as far as
anyone knew - as neither did the three on trial at Kingston. The
obvious person to ask about all this would be Magdy El-Nashar, the
Leeds Biochemistry graduate who was renting the Alexander Grove flat.
His complete disappearance is symptomatic of this case.
The French anti-terror chief Christophe Chaboud informed The Times that
�traces of �military plastic explosive, more deadly and efficient than
commercial varieties, are understood to have been found in the debris
of the wrecked underground carriages and the bus.� (Times,
July 13th). That seems the most credible account that anyone is likely
to give us. How did the story get from there to black pepper in a bath?
The most recent storytellers seem not to carry a memory of this earlier
phase.
A
conclusive argument can never be based upon CCTV images released three
years after the event; it should rest, however, upon the demonstrated
absence of murder weapon. It remains possible that the four young men
did meet up in Luton car-park that morning; but if the British public
wish to apprehend what caused the dreadful carnage in London on that
day they will have to search elsewhere than in the rucksacks of those
young men.
My conclusion is that they were dust explosions
The London Tube Bombings Fantasy July 7, 2005
Fake terrorism broadcasts planned for 7 July 2005
|
