I'm getting some suggestions that I may get arrested soon so I had better start writing. This is exactly what I'd expect of course - my analysis strongly suggests that there have never been any suicide bombers in UK, the perpetrators of the 7 July 2005 atrocities were certainly not militant Islamists, terrorist arrests and control orders have always been a political tool to be used occasionally shortly before elections. Imagine that you were a Fascist government. Wouldn't you want to lock up your fiercest critics for 90 or 42 days before an election? Wouldn't you want to attempt to apply a control order to isolate your enemy - no use of telephones, no use of the internet, scare all his contacts away? And all without any evidence ...

My analysis is yet to be completed so I'll just provide you with a few findings that I have probably not mentioned before.

I have mentioned that senior policemen (or not) have to engage in high-profile nonsense to be newsworthy and get their message across. This continues.

I've also noticed that many victims of murders and over the top so-called anti-terrorism raids which Tony Blair supports one hundred and one percent have brothers that are imprisoned for firearms offences. Strange that don't you think? Who would have access to that sort of information?

I realise what police claims to "a watershed" mean now. It's often used in superficially very inappropriate circumstances e.g. the 'investigation' into the murder of Jessie James.