object width="425" height="350"><
Friday, January 23, 2009 -7:03 PM -
FREIGHT 88
This site is best viewed by
'Clicking on 'View' at the top of your browser
scrolling down to 'Text size' and selecting 'Largest'
after you have done this, Press key [F11]
Please scroll down for latest entries
|
|
Permanent Link |
Monday, October 20, 2008 -1:08 PM -
If you agree or disagree with me, feel free to contact me at:
freight88@topmail.co.uk
IMPORTANT YOU CANNOT SEND ME AN E-MAIL BY JUST CLICKING ON THE ABOVE ADDRESS AS THE pop in Outlook is f*cked.... SO JUST COPY/ PASTE THE ABOVE ADDRESS INTO YOR OWN E-MAIL 'SEND'
THIS SITE IS BEING CONSTANTLY UP-DATED
SO PLEASE CHECK BACK OFTEN.
|
|
Permanent Link |
Monday, October 20, 2008 -1:05 PM - Enoch Powell, if only they had listened!
Enoch warned us over 40 years ago, no one listened. 'Rivers of blood' although they try to hush it up it is happening now but unfortunately not against the invaders but against our own people. Take a look at 'The Fallen List' HERE. Please watch this video until the end. J.H.
Click to view
Remember: Jihad works both ways!
|
|
Permanent Link |
Sunday, October 5, 2008 -8:28 PM - Thanks Pino!
Kimbo Slice Vs. Seth Petruzelli
10/4/08 Kimbo Loss!!!
Watch this vid and see what happens when tough street fighting Black man comes up against a White man with balls!
Click to view
Opinion: All the Hip Hop fools out there, "We lovin Kimbo" All the Holly wood fools out there, "We lovin Kimbo" Its a media creation just like Obama, its all ridiculousness! Watch the vid below!
Exhalting the Blackman in all areas of life in the USA is not a good idea because at the end of the day they cannot handle it, they rely on 'Whitey' to survive. J.H.
|
|
Permanent Link |
Saturday, October 4, 2008 -1:16 PM - Too right mate
Source: http://isupporttheresistance.blogspot.com/
 This Old Lady has had enough
Patriotism, loyalty to ones country? If I lived in say Bedford, Luton, Bradford and a host of other towns and cities in this country I might have to ask myself, loyalty? Loyalty to whom.
As a newly arrived visitor I would have to inquire as to what country I have arrived in. If as a young man thinking of joining the military I would also have to ask myself who I will be defending, would I be defending the status quo, a government who refuses to give the people a voice as to who governs them, an overbearing stifling totalitarian socialist system?
Would I be defending OUR people? That would be a grand gesture indeed; our government is not defending our people, they appear to be hell bent on diluting our culture, blurring our sense of identity and removing our right to free speech and forcing an ideology on its people by force, threats and intimidation and by the use of laws especially crafted to achieve these ends and to hold its frightened people in meek subservience .
Do I have to flee to a foreign country for fear of being incarcerated for telling the truth? I have these words continually echoing in my head first uttered by a bewigged, crimson-robed man of the law “The truth is no defence” now that is something to be really concerned about.
The aging English lady in a headscarf walking slowly to the shops tries to avoid making eye contact with threatening alien people. She is a battler, she just scrapes by as many people do, she might have to go to the doctor and will not be surprised by the fact she is the only one of her colour and of her race in the waiting room. She might be referred to the hospital but there are no beds for her people, they appear to be full of aliens.
You must understand the people who should be looking after her have to pay another government £1.2 million pounds an hour of every day of every year, subscriptions to an unelected pseudo government; they can’t afford to use her people’s taxes to give them comfort in their latter years. Is this just a bad dream?
A visitor has every right to ask, how long has this been going on, but more importantly why don’t the people throw these disloyal traitorous, treacherous, self interested leeches out of government. Well it might be that the people have given up hope. They might ask what the alternative is. With the three main political parties all with identical political ideologies there is no alternative.
The people are being socially conditioned, it’s a grand experiment. As long as they understand that they were born to be ruled, and not to question, upset nor threaten the status quo the fat cats can continue to feed at the tax payer funded subsidised trough in the Parliament house restaurant.
If a saviour does appear it’s almost impossible to believe this might lead to true democratic freedom for the people, the country and a bright future for its children. But when the government sees this threat looming they will do everything it its power to smear, crucify, vilify even going to the extremes of equating them to Nazi’s and fascists and enemies of the people.
If the citizens of this land don’t know by now who are the enemies of the people, maybe there is no hope. Ask the old lady in the headscarf, she can tell you.
This is the sheer desperation and self interest and depths of moral depravity these anti British traitors will sink to hold on to power and they reside in all levels of government.
By Albion.
|
|
Permanent Link |
Saturday, October 4, 2008 -1:03 PM - The Marxist Left are the real Fascists
Source: http://www.bnp.org.uk/2008
Labour, Tory, Lib-Dem Council
Fascists Censor News
Fascists in the Tory, Lib-Dem and Labour parties all censor news about immigrant crime and disorder in the towns they control by consciously intervening to manipulate the press.
This shocking news is contained in a report produced by the Department of Communities and Local Government called “Guidance for local authorities on community cohesion planning and tension monitoring”, a copy of which has fallen into the hands of Private Eye magazine.
The document reveals how Tameside Council in Greater Manchester (Labour: 44 seats; Tories: 10 seats) and Berwick-upon-Tweed council in Northumberland (Lib-Dems: 13 seats; Tories: 10 seats) have active programmes to intervene in the local press coverage so as to avoid the truth about immigrant activity making the news.
According to the document, “Berwick-Upon-Tweed’s crime and disorder reduction partnership is working with the local press/media to vet stories involving migrant workers employed in the food processing and agricultural sectors to avoid stigmatisation.”
Tameside, the document proudly continues, “holds regular meetings with local newspaper editors to gather information and stop sensationalist reporting which might otherwise start or add to rising tensions.”
In other words, these fascists actively suppress any news which, in their opinion, might allow native British people to see what mass immigration is doing to their society.
“For example,” the document says, “in response to Kick Racism out of Football campaign, an extremist political group wanted to picket a football stadium. A local newspaper was going to run the story on its front page — an action that is likely to bring unwanted publicity to the picket and fuel rising community tensions. The intervention of the Community Cohesion Partnership prevented the story from being run, and in the event, no one turned our for the picket.”
So who were the sinister extremists? A radical non-white group? The Socialist Workers’ Party? Tameside Council will not say. But, as Private Eye remarked: “We think we should be told — not told what to think.”
Tories, Lib-Dems, Labour — fascists one and all.
|
|
Permanent Link |
Saturday, October 4, 2008 -12:56 PM - The Marxists control our Police Force!
Source: http://www.bnp.org.uk/2008
UPDATED — Fascists Force
Policeman to Resign over
BNP Badge
The disgraceful fascists who run Britain’s police force have forced a 14 year veteran of the Greater Manchester Police to resign simply because he was seen wearing a BNP badge while off duty at a football match.
Stuart Janaway, 36, wore the BNP badge to a game at Old Trafford in September 2006, while he was off duty.
The fascists held a “misconduct hearing” last Friday after an investigation by the force’s Professional Standards Branch. As a result, police said Mr Janaway was “required to resign.”
Chief fascist, Acting Assistant Chief Constable Terry Sweeney, head of the Professional Standards Branch, disgraced his uniform by telling the press that “Item six of the Chief Constable’s Order of 2004…makes it clear that officers are banned from being members of the BNP.”
Somehow Sweeney ignored the fact that it is perfectly legal to be a police officer and a member of the Communist Party, or any Islamic group in Britain, even those who have definitively been linked to terrorist incidents.
It is also important to bear in mind that the police officer was not even a member of the BNP.
The institutional anti-white racism which permeates society is nowhere better illustrated with this incident, which also shows the utter fear in which the ruling elite live. For good reason as well: When the BNP comes to power, these traitors will be made to pay for their crimes.
Update: The “BNP badge” case stands in stark contrast to a Greater Manchester Muslim police officer, who, in 2004, was allowed to keep his job after fleeing the scene of a car crash and trying to stage a cover-up.
PC Tariq Mahmood, 30, was convicted in court after he left two women and a child injured. He later re-sprayed his car and tried to persuade his sister and girlfriend to say they had been driving.
Despite the obvious criminality of this act, Mahmood, who was based at Bootle Street, was only fined a week’s wages at an internal police disciplinary hearing and allowed to keep his job.
Mahmood, who joined Greater Manchester Police in 1994 as a special constable, was off duty when his red Alfa Romeo collided with a Peugeot 106 in Stamford Street East, Ashton under Lyne. Despite the fact that two women and a child in the other car needed hospital treatment for minor injuries, PC Mahmood drove off at high speed.
When he was caught he claimed he had not been thinking straight because he was traumatised by his mother’s murder in Pakistan in 1999.
PC Mahmood was fined £575 by magistrates and banned from driving for a year after he admitted failing to stop after an accident, failing to report an accident and driving without insurance.
But a GMP disciplinary panel of senior police officers decided that he could keep his job. They fined him five days’ pay - £425 - instead of the maximum 13 days.
One rule for British people, one rule for immigrants — that appears to be the law.
|
|
Permanent Link |
Saturday, October 4, 2008 -12:50 PM - Forced to live in fear thanks to the Marxist scum that rule us!
Source: http://www.timesonline.co.uk
From The Times
October 2, 2008
'Severe' risk of terrorist attack
close to 7/7 level
Michael Evans, Defence Editor
The terrorist threat to Britain from home-grown al-Qaeda-inspired radical Muslims is almost as high as it was after the July 7 suicide bombings in London in 2005, according to the latest security assessment.
The threat level has been graded “severe”, the second-highest terrorist-alert status, for the past 12 months. After the July 7 bombings, followed by the July 21 failed plot, the threat assessment was put at “critical”, indicating a red alert. Since then the level was raised once more to “critical”, during incidents in Glasgow and London last year, and then reduced to “severe”.
A senior Whitehall source, however, admitted yesterday: “It's now at the severe end of ‘severe'.” The official said that the police and MI5 were working at full capacity to keep abreast of all suspected terrorist plots. Evidence from intelligence operations and information gleaned from within Muslim communities have indicated that there is an increased level of terrorist-related activity.
“There's lot of ambient activity, some of it sourced to al-Qaeda core [leadership] in the Pakistan/Afghanistan border area,” one source said.
Four special counter-terrorist “hubs” have been established in London, Manchester, Birmingham and Leeds to increase joint police and MI5 efforts in dealing with suspected terrorists. A fifth hub is being planned.
A key al-Qaeda figure, in the view of the British intelligence community, is Rashid Rauf, suspected of being linked to the Heathrow bomb plot of August 2006. Mr Rauf, a British citizen of Pakistani origin, fled from his home in Birmingham in 2002 after his uncle was found murdered, and was arrested in Pakistan in 2006 on suspicion of involvement in the Heathrow plot. He escaped and is believed to be in the tribal regions in Pakistan. “Rashid Rauf is key to us,” the official said.
The Whitehall source added that there was new concern over lone terrorists - individuals who have acquired bomb-making expertise without having any obvious affiliation either to known radical groups in this country or to al-Qaeda masterminds in Pakistan. Detecting lone would-be bombers was a big challenge, the official said, but he emphasised that increasingly active dialogue with leaders of Britain's mosques might help.
MI5 has indicated that about 2,000 individuals in Britain are regarded as being involved in terrorist-related activity, and this figure may now have risen, according to security sources.
The Government, through the Office for Security and CounterTerrorism at the Home Office, is drawing up a new counter-terror strategy, due to be published at the end of the year. There will also be a set of 19 target indicators issued to gauge progress made. Some of these targets will remain classified.
As part of the strategy, the Government is now funding organisations that run anti-Jihad and anti-al-Qaeda websites, in an attempt to counter propaganda put out by extremist Muslim organisations. The Department of Education is also expected to issue guidelines for teachers in schools with a strong Muslim presence to try to get across a more positive message about life and values in Britain.
|
|
Permanent Link |
Saturday, October 4, 2008 -12:43 PM - Never mind the head scarfs...Ban Muslims, end of!
Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news
Ban Muslim headscarves,
say teachers
Nearly half of teachers believe Muslim headscarves should be banned in schools, new research has shown.
By Billy Kenber
Last Updated: 12:42AM BST 03 Oct 2008
Comments 12 |
Forty-six percent of primary and secondary school teachers suggested that allowing pupils to wear religious symbols went against British values.
They also feared it would undermine the drive to promote religious and racial harmony in schools.
The findings, in a poll carried out by YouGov, will fuel the controversial debate about the wearing of religious symbols in schools.
Currently, individual schools are free to make their own decisions, but a string of recent court ruling said some policies amounted to "unlawful discrimination".
In July, a Sikh schoolgirl, won a discrimination case against her school after she was banned from wearing a religious bangle.
John Dunford, general secretary of the Association of College and Student Leaders, defended the right of schools to decide for themselves.
He said he was "very concerned" that the courts may "prevent schools in future from setting appropriate uniform standards."
"Where you have an identifiable religious community it is good practice for the school to discuss uniform with that local community, as they do with parents," he added.
Christine Blowers, acting general secretary of the National Union of Teachers, said when pupils breached a uniform code it often harmed cohesion.
She said: "There should be basic guidelines in a school which everyone conforms to such as dress or language. If some individuals breach these guidelines there can be a perception that its more difficult to manage the whole school."
The poll, commissioned by Teachers TV, found that more than 70 per cent of teachers agreed that the promotion of British values was part of a teacher's role.
Andrew Bethell, chief executive of Teachers TV, said that the results marked a "shift away from multiculturalism" in the "post 7/7 Britain".
He added: "There seems to be an increasing feeling among teachers that simply embracing difference is no longer enough. Pupils need a sense of common identity and 'Britishness' is a big part of this."
|
|
Permanent Link |
Saturday, October 4, 2008 -12:38 PM - It's only matter of time.. The Labour Immigration Timebomb!
Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk
Hundreds of pupils to get TB
blood tests after school
outbreak
By Anna Davis
Last updated at 2:30 PM on 03rd October 2008
Scare: Six pupils at a secondary school have caught TB.
Symptoms of the disease include a prolonged,
unexplained cough (posed by model)
Hundreds of school children are at risk of catching TB after an outbreak of the disease at a community college.
Every child at one secondary school will be screened for tuberculosis after six pupils were diagnosed with the infection.
Health experts fear they picked up the illness while at South Camden Community College.
All teachers and pupils who attended the school over the past year will be asked to have a blood test.
Worried parents are now campaigning for all pupils to be given the BCG vaccination, which protects against TB but is no longer routinely given.
A spokeswoman for the Health Protection Agency said that three of the six pupils diagnosed with TB have an identical strain, which means they may have caught it at school.
Of the six, one pupil is still receiving treatment , while the other five had a type of the disease that was not infectious.
Grainne Nixon from the North East and Central London Health Protection Unit, said: "Infectious tuberculosis is a disease that typically requires close, prolonged and frequent contact with a person with TB disease in the lung before transmission occurs.
"The greatest risk of spread is therefore to people who live in the same household. The risk to contacts outside of the household, including those in a school setting, is usually low.
"However because three of the six students have an identical strain of TB and are in different year groups we have decided to screen everyone at the school as a precaution
"I would like to reassure parents that TB is not a disease that is easy to catch. It is however important that everyone is aware of the symptoms, which include a prolonged unexplained cough, fevers and weight loss."
One mother said: "I think they should have called a whole school meeting. I was extremely worried when I was told my son would not be given his BCG vaccination, but I was told the likelihood of him being exposed to TB was very low.
"I am going to campaign to bring back vaccinations for all schoolchildren.It seems crazy that they stopped them, and then we hear that six pupils have been diagnosed with TB."
|
|
Permanent Link |
Saturday, October 4, 2008 -12:30 PM - Another girl getting her culture enriched!
Source: http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news
Hunt for city rapist
9:20am Friday 3rd October 2008
 Comments (8) Have your say »
 By Sian Davies »
SHE was subjected to a harrowing ordeal by a man who preyed on her vulnerability.
The 19-year-old student had been enjoying a night out with friends in Southampton and was making her way home when she was approached by two men.
Despite her attempts to escape, the pair refused to be shaken off and followed her into an alleyway where one of them raped her.
A year on from the horrific assault she is still receiving counselling every day.
Today detectives have released CCTV images of two men they want to speak to. The pair are seen in the St Mary’s area near where the assault happened and again in the alleyway moments after the victim was raped in the early hours of October 4.
Investigating officer Det Sgt Steve Maldon said: “We are calling on the public to help us identify these men who we believe can help with the investigation. This was an horrific attack on a vulnerable lone female which understandably she is still suffering the effects of.”
The CCTV images have been released after a number of lines of inquiry were exhausted by the team who now believe the public could hold the key to identifying the attacker.
Det Insp Dave Dilly said: “We hope people may remember being out in the city at this time last year and come forward with information. We are still committed to finding those responsible and bringing them to justice.”
Both men were black, aged between 20 and 25 and spoke with African accents. One was described as stocky and about 6ft with a scruffy goatee beard. He was wearing a light grey hooded tracksuit top with a dark logo on the chest and a black buckled belt over dark trousers, possibly jeans.
The second man was of skinny build and approximately 5ft 8in. He wore a distinctive bright yellow zip-up jacket, blue jeans and white trainers.
Anyone with information about the incident or who recognises the men can contact the team at Hulse Road quoting Operation Orchard on 0845 045 4545.
|
|
Permanent Link |
Saturday, October 4, 2008 -12:21 PM - Good Riddence!
Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news
Shed no tears for this Labour
stooge who forgot how
to police
Last updated at 1:25 AM on 03rd October 2008
'Sir Ian clearly thought he was a cut
above a normal police officer,
attending to boring details like cutting
crime and protecting the public'
So he's finally gone. Sir Ian Blair has been forced out of office - and about time too. His resignation brings to an ignominious end one of the most ill-starred and destructive top appointments in the history not just of the Met but of any police force in Britain.
The last of many last straws was a corruption scandal, with allegations that he used public money to pay an agency run by a close friend a five-figure sum as an 'image consultant', one of a series of questionable deals he made with this firm.
Leave aside the question of whether this broke any rules. The idea that a police officer should need an 'image consultant' at all is in itself quite astounding. Who on earth does he think he is!
But then, Sir Ian clearly thought he was a cut above a normal police officer attending to boring details like cutting crime and protecting the public.
Indeed, his tenure at the top of the Met was characterised from the start by a combination of preening arrogance and serial incompetence. The worse the damage done to the reputation of the force under his lamentable command, the more preposterously he strutted about.
His stewardship of the Met saw the reputation of Britain's most important police force put through the shredder. It is hard to think of any senior officer who has had a more destructive impact.
Obviously, the most spectacular debacle was the killing of Jean Charles de Menezes, who was shot dead by police at Stockwell tube station after they mistakenly identified him as a suicide bomber.
The aftermath of that fiasco highlighted the question that was repeatedly raised during Sir Ian's period in office: How on earth did such a man manage to cling on to his job?
It wasn't just that the Stockwell shooting was the outcome of shambolic police procedures. It wasn't just that Sir Ian admitted that during the shooting and for 24 hours afterwards, he had no idea what was going on in his own force.
How was he not sacked earlier?
Most shockingly of all, he initially breached his statutory duty to refer such an incident to the Independent Police Complaints Commission. Meanwhile, he was to be seen grandstanding on TV with information he had got off the television and which was quickly shown to be wrong.
It defies belief that he was not sacked after that shameful episode. But this was merely the most spectacular example of his unsuitability for the vital office he filled.
More from Melanie Phillips...
His trademark as Commissioner was a deadly combination of incompetence and political correctness, both of which fed into and reinforced each other.
In the past few months, the Met has been all but paralysed by a string of legal actions brought by ethnic minority officers claiming racial discrimination.
For sure, many of these cases are mischievous and some of these officers have been behaving disgracefully. But that is a direct result of Sir Ian's fetish of antiracism and promotion of 'diversity' within the Met, junking common sense and fairness along the way.
This was matched by his blunders and gaffes displaying lack of professionalism and poor judgment, equalled only by a truly monumental arrogance.
Sir Ian seemed to fancy himself as an intellectual who had unaccountably found himself slumming it as a police officer. While Londoners gave up bothering to report crimes to the police who had vanished from their streets, he was delivering in the 2005 Dimbleby lecture his cerebral thoughts about the state of society - in which he revealed that he didn't have a clue about what the police were actually for.
Political suck-up
The reason this absurd figure remained in office for so long was surely the way he sucked up to Labour politicians, pushing their pet ideologies and even specific policies which just happened to be on the New Labour agenda during the last General Election campaign.
Sir Ian is, however, merely the most extreme example of a sickness that has crippled the police way beyond the Met.
Instead of protecting the public against bullying and injustice, the police have been turned by their Chief Commissioner into an instrument of bullying and injustice.
Law-abiding folk find themselves harassed and even prosecuted, while the police look the other way from miscreants who tick boxes marked ' diversity' or 'disadvantaged'.
What people want is a police chief who is not a politicised stooge spouting the gibberish he learned in a university arts or social science department, not some posturing peacock playing to the political or fashionable gallery, but an officer who will prevent crime, promote public tranquillity and bring criminals to justice.
Sir Ian's successor must take the pc out of policing, restore the Met's shattered morale and make the public believe again that the police are actually on their side.
No easy task. The Met is now a veritable Augean stable to be cleansed.
|
|
Permanent Link |
Saturday, October 4, 2008 -12:11 PM - Return of the Faggot for a third time!
Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news
Malignant, malevolent, mendacious
- this creep is a cancer on British life
Last updated at 2:03 AM on 04th October 2008
On the day Peter Mandelson was forced to resign in disgrace for the second time, I can remember writing that he wouldn’t be out of work long.
He’d get his reward either in Brussels or the House of Lords.
Even I didn’t imagine that one day he’d achieve both. Nor that it would be Gordon Brown who brought him back from Brussels and swathed him in ermine.
Yes, that Gordon Brown.
The one who was so determined to get rid of Mandelson first time around that he was prepared to sacrifice two of his most trusted supporters to seal his sacking.
The embodiment of all that is rotten about Labour:
Peter Mandelson at Downing St
That would be the same Gordon Brown who has been foaming with hatred for Mandelson ever since he switched sides and supported Tony Blair for the leadership when John Smith died.
If Mandelson is the answer, what was the question? Imagine the scene inside Number 10 on Thursday night.
‘It’s bad news, Prime Minister. We’re trailing in the polls, the Tories have had a great conference, we look like getting hammered in the Glenrothes by-election, the country is bankrupt and trust in the Government is at an all-time low. We’re all doomed.’
‘Don’t panic, Darling. Salvation is at hand. Get Peter Mandelson on the phone.’
‘Brilliant, Gordon.’ The commentariat spent yesterday debating whether this was a masterstroke by the Prime Minister or the act of a madman.
Trust me, this was the act of a madman. Brown came into office promising to draw a line under the spin, sleaze, dishonesty and division of the Blair years. It was always nonsense, but enough people fell for it. Yet he has now recalled into his Cabinet the living embodiment of all that is rotten and disreputable about New Labour.
Short of Call Me Dave making Jeffrey-Archer his new Tory Party treasurer, it is difficult to think of a more outrageous political appointment.
Putting this odious, discredited creep back into one of the great offices of state is an affront to any definition of decency.
The only consolation to be drawn when Blair handed Mandelson a first-class ticket on the Brussels gravy train was that at least the most malignant tumour on Britain’s body politic had been cut out.
No one, with the possible exception of Alastair Campbell, has done more to poison the well of public life. Campbell was the sewer, but Mandelson was pure sewage.
If the average human body is around 70 per cent water, then Mandelson is 90 per cent spite. There has been no more malevolent influence in Westminster in a generation.
He was the Backstairs Billy of slanderous briefings against sworn enemies and so- called friends alike.
More from Richard Littlejohn...
He delighted in doing his damnedest to ruin careers – including that of his new best friend Gordon Brown.
Mandelson gloried in his self-styled image as the ‘Prince of Darkness’. Except he wasn’t very good at it.
There’s a line in the movie, The Usual Suspects, that the greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was to convince people he didn’t exist.
But whenever one of Mandy’s diabolical schemes fell apart, as they inevitably did, the trail always led back to his door.
As the posse rounded the corner, there was Mandelson with his trousers round his ankles and the smoking gun in his hand.
For a man who was said to be brilliant at operating in the shadows, he loved the limelight. His vanity, along with his capacity for choosing his enemies injudiciously, was his undoing.
Whenever Mandelson pulled a stroke, he couldn’t help boasting about it. Needless to say, in the febrile world of politics, his misdeeds always had a way of reaching the ears of those with a score to settle.
How else does he think we found out about his, er, indiscretions, those repeated ‘errors of judgment’ which were to cost him his Cabinet career not once, but twice?
In the end, even Campbell worked out that Mandelson was a liability who had to be put down.
But instead of consigning him to oblivion, Blair, to his eternal shame (not that he has any) sent him to Brussels.
So what, precisely, is it that the Prime Minister thinks Mandelson is going to bring to the party?
Laughably, it was being suggested yesterday that he has wide experience of ‘international finance’ on the strength of attending a few trade fairs .
Maybe Gordon is planning to put Peter in charge of the banking collapse.
After all, if anyone knows about making money out of a building society, he does. Readers may remember that his first fall from grace, little more than a year after
Labour achieved power, came after he was exposed for borrowing £373,000 from fellow minister Geoffrey Robinson and then lying to his mortgage lender to obtain by deception another £150,000 to buy a house he otherwise couldn’t possibly afford.
Anyone else caught in those circumstances would have attracted the attention of the fraud squad and probably ended up in prison.
Mandelson lost his job, was forced to pay the money back and sell the house – but he pocketed the £250,000 profit.
(Brown demanded Mandelson’s sacking, but Blair wanted to keep him. Part of the deal was that Robinson - a wealthy businessman and Brown’s political benefactor, and Charlie Whelan, his fiercely loyal press secretary - a thorn in the side of both Mandelson and Campbell - would have to go, too. Gordon appeared to have no hesitation in throwing them over the side to get rid of the hated Mandelson. So much for loyalty.)
But with indecent haste and a total absence of shame all round, Blair brought Mandelson back into the Cabinet a few months later.
Even then he didn’t learn his lesson. The Mail on Sunday discovered him up to his neck in a scam to avoid stamp duty on his new flat.
Gordon Brown had just introduced a higher-rate tax on purchases over £250,000. To get round this, Mandelson registered his purchase price as £249,000 – less than he actually paid – and ‘apportioned’ another few thousand on ‘fixtures and fittings’ to save himself £3,700.
It wasn’t illegal. But it was scandalous, immoral and disloyal. As a member of the Cabinet, Mandelson would have known the rules. But again, his ocean-going arrogance convinced him he would get away with it.
And while we’re on the subject, Mandelson has never satisfactorily explained where he got the money to buy a £2.4million home in London’s Primrose Hill on a salary of £160,000 – even with a modest family inheritance, profits from previous sales and a postal order from Australia.
Maybe he got a mortgage from Northern Rock. Let’s hope he told them the truth.
Yet now he’s Prime Minister, Gordon Brown obviously doesn’t see a history of tax avoidance, criminal deception and financial ‘errors of judgment’ as a barrier to a seat in the Cabinet.
The Prime Minister must also have forgotten all about Mandelson’s role in the ‘cash for passports’ scandal (which led to his second sacking) when he decided he was just the man to put in charge of the ministry of business.
It’s a stroke of genius. Mandelson has never met a wealthy businessman he doesn’t like – especially if said businessman is offering him a no-questions-asked personal loan or a substantial contribution to Labour funds.
In bringing him back, Gordon Brown has demonstrated yet again his contempt for probity in public life, his own lack of principle and has forfeited any remaining claim to a ‘moral compass’.
I used to wonder: what has Mandelson got on Blair?
Now, I wonder: what has he got on Gordon?
There has to be some rational explanation.
How much lower can Brown sink: Two Jags for Lord Chancellor, anyone?
The only question left is whether Brown’s government will last long enough for Mandelson to be forced to resign in disgrace for a third time.
|
|
Permanent Link |
Wednesday, October 1, 2008 -7:20 PM - The Lib/Lab/Con traitors really are truely gutless!
Source: http://www.bnp.org.uk/2008
Birmingham Will See Rise in
Ethnic Violence - But There’s
Nothing We Can Do About It
Say Tories
England’s second city will see a sharp rise in religious and ethnic violence thanks to multiculturalism, admitted a leading Tory yesterday. But in true Conservative style, he offered no solution to this worrying prediction.
Speaking at a fringe meeting at the Conservative Party Conference, Paul Goodman, Conservative Shadow Minister for Local Government and Community Cohesion, said that the prospect for inter-ethnic and inter-religious violence would increase as Birmingham came ever closer to becoming a “plural city” in which whites were the minority.
Birmingham is due to become majority non-indigenous in 2027, based on current demographic trends. Demonstrating that this ethnic-cleansing of the British people wasn’t of any importance to the Tories, Goodman said:
“We can see, looking ahead, that you have this picture of diversity and plurality, and cities are going to look very different.
“For policy-makers, in one sense this is all very exciting.”
Goodman made no comment as to whether native whites in Birmingham might not find all this cultural genocide quite as “exciting” as the shadow minister, but Goodman went on to admit that such “excitement” may bring a few problems:
“In another sense, I think there are going to be cultural clashes in these plural cities, between different groups with different value systems, and different outlooks.”
In such a melting-pot, Goodman admitted that racial antagonism would come to the fore:
“Tensions could be caused by racism, including racist attitudes from some ethnic minorities towards each other. One issue is what you might call old-fashioned racism. Racism hasn’t gone away, and not just what you might call old-fashioned white on ethnic minority racism. There are also other forms of racism taking place.
“When there was a great wave of people coming in seeking asylum five years ago, there were reports from channel ports about different recently-arrived groups having very tense relations with each other.”
Religious, as well as ethnic, differences would further fuel the “excitement” Goodman continued:
“There is a positive side to this, but I think there will also be culture clashes.
“I think the attitude of Muslims in cities on licensing, even on the annual gay pride march, isn’t necessarily going to be the same in those areas as everyone else.”
So, violence on the streets of England’s second city is caused by the insanity of pursuing the ludicrous policy of multiculturalism, a situation that Goodman’s Tories helped create and a policy they still support.
Was there any solution to the problem, according to perhaps the future Minister for Community Cohesion? Passing the buck and much burying of heads in the sand seems to be the way forward according to Mr. Goodman. Speaking on what his government could do to deal with these issues, he said:
“I think it’s very important to be clear about what national government can and cannot do.
“National government can’t do everything, and I think its role in Birmingham or other big cities is limited, and local politicians are going to have to take the lead.”
|
|
Permanent Link |
Wednesday, October 1, 2008 -7:08 PM - Replacing true Brits with scum!
Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news
Flight of white Britons from UK
leaps to 70,000 per year
By Steve Doughty
Last updated at 3:14 AM on 30th September 2008
Thousands of Britons leave our shores every year for a new life abroad, official figures show.
But although 75,000 'white British' men and women are moving away, the population is still rising because of an influx of ethnic minority groups.
According to Government estimates, the established white population of England dropped by nearly 250,000 between 2002 and 2006.
It's better abroad: Sun-worshippers enjoying Bondi Beach in Sydney -
about 50,000 Britons head for Australia each year
Official figures have previously indicated that about 50,000 Britons head for Australia each year and about 30,000 for New Zealand. Last year, a record 400,000 left the country to live abroad for at least 12 months.
Yesterday's estimates, which show how each ethnic group grew or diminished between 2005 and 2006, provide further evidence of so-called white flight'.
The white British population went down by 70,400 over the year through emigration. And the white Irish population fell by 4,600 because of emigration, bringing the total decline in the existing white population to 75,000.
The figures have been calculated for every year back to 2002 - and this was the biggest decline yet.
In the previous year, there had been a drop of just 42,300.
Better than Britain? Auckland in New Zealand, a country that about
30,000 Britons head for each year
In 2004, there was a fall of 74,100. Even though there were more births than deaths, the white British and Irish population still fell by almost 15,000 in 2006.
Immigration increased the numbers in other groups, notably among those officially categorised as 'other white', including arrivals from Poland and Eastern Europe. This group grew by 70,600 in 2006.
There were also increases in the Indian, Pakistani, African and Chinese ethnic populations.
The estimates were greeted with alarm by the immigration think-tank Migration Watch.
Its chairman Sir Andrew Green said: 'The unavoidable conclusion is that the whole nature of our society will change very rapidly unless the Government moves from spin to serious action, which the vast majority of the public want to see.'
Previous surveys by officials have shown that most of those who emigrate go to Australia, New Zealand, France, Spain or the U.S.
The most popular is Australia. About 220,000 more Britons have gone to Australia than vice versa between 1996 and 2006. And 40,000 more Britons than Canadians have switched between the two countries.
Best move of our lives
Fed up with high crime, the rising cost of living and a lack of community spirit, Julie Parry and her family packed their bags and left Britain.
She and her husband Eddie, 42, sold their house in Exmouth, Devon, in 2006 and moved to the remote town of Okotoks, in Alberta, Canada, with sons Brandon, five, and Frasier, seven.
Mrs Parry, 32, said: 'Britain isn't the same country me and Eddie grew up in.
Happier life: Julie Perry with husband Eddie and sons Brandon
and Frasier in Alberta Canada were they have moved
'It's just the amount of crime and the high cost of living.
'We were both working yet at the end of the month there was hardly anything left. We reached a point where we though there must be another way, so we moved.'
Going to Canada was ' probably the best thing we've ever done', she said.
'The quality of life here phenomenal. There's such a sense of community. Friends who visit can't believe how little things cost.' Mrs Parry runs a business helping Britons move to Canada.
- About 9,300 men and women aged over 100 were living in England and Wales last year, according to official figures.
In 1911, just 100 were estimated to have reached their 100th birthday.
|
|
Permanent Link |
Wednesday, October 1, 2008 -7:00 PM - 4,000 a day and thats just the ones we know about!
Source: http://www.express.co.uk
4,000 IMMIGRANTS FLOCK
TO BRITAIN EACH DAY
Ours? Funny how those who shout Britain is a country of Immigrants
are Immigrants who want to settle in the UK with no Legal Status
and enjoy free healthcare, Social housing and the benefit system.
By Tom Whitehead, Home Affairs Correspondent
ALMOST 4,000 temporary migrants arrive in Britain every day and those who stay to work have increased by more than a quarter, figures revealed yesterday.
The number of short-term migrants here at any one time has also shot up to nearly 300,000.
At the same time, far more Britons are leaving to work or visit overseas than foreigners arriving here.
The figures come two weeks after a former Archbishop of Canterbury warned spiralling immigration could spill over into violence on Britain’s streets if not addressed.
A total of 1,437,000 migrants arrived and stayed for less than a year in the 12 months to June 2006, the Office for National Statistics revealed.
That was the equivalent of 3,937 people arriving each day and a 15 per cent rise on the year before. It was also a 28 per cent increase on 2004, showing the impact EU expansion to Eastern Europe had on in-flows of temporary migrants to Britain. A short-term migrant is one staying for less than 12 months.
The document estimated 291,000 migrants were in the country at any one time during the year to June 2006 – a rise of 12 per cent on the previous year.
Around 64,000 were here for work – a rise of 28 per cent. Some 54,000 were studying while the remainder were temporarily resident for “other” reasons such as holidays or family visits.
At the same time, Britons are leaving at a far higher rate. Some 2.519million Britons or long-term immigrants left for up to 12 months in the year to June 2006.
Some 79,000 were for work and 28,000 for study with the rest for “other” reasons, again usually long holidays or family visits.
|
|
Permanent Link |
Wednesday, October 1, 2008 -6:53 PM - Yes AntiFa are the real fascists!
Source: http://www.spearhead.com
Hate Filled Reds
We are told that ‘nazism’ is once again on the march in Europe. The recent success of so-called far-right political parties has inevitably evoked many such sensationalist reactions from journalists, and perhaps none more so than in the case of BBC correspondent Angus Roxburgh's Preachers of Hate, which evokes the image of SS Jackboots pounding throughout the continent. Roxburgh's book uses the term ‘neo-nazi’ sweepingly, to encompass just about everybody from the SS-praising Jorg Haider to homosexual libertarian Pim Fortuyn. They, and the groups they apparently embody, are all lazily accused of being modern ‘nazis’ - key players in the politics of ‘hate.’
Of course, one of Roxburgh's problems is that he is unable, or unwilling, to define what ‘far-right’ or ‘nazi’ actually mean, allowing him to use these emotive terms entirely unquestioned. So perhaps we should think for a moment about this point. What defines ‘nazism’ for most people? I would suggest it is the projection of hatred and fear onto certain groups, scapegoating these groups; the smearing and dehumanising of opponents; and suppression of free speech and the desire for a One-Party State. Now, if this is so, then ‘nazism’ would indeed seem to be ‘on the march’, but this is not embodied in Haider or Fortuyn. It is embodied in the ‘anti-fascist’ movement, which has been marching through Europe (including Britain) evoking fear and stirring up hate wherever it goes.
Dehumanising opponents
The Nazis are famously reputed to have dehumanised their opponents. Jews were compared to a plague of rats in a film by Dr. Goebbels. Schoolchildren were taught in an equally notorious story book that the Jew was The Poisoned Mushroom. But in Britain the ‘Anti-Nazi’ League, the magazine Searchlight and many in the Labour Party portray their opponents in an equally dehumanised fashion. Referring to the latter as ‘nazis’ clearly has this purpose in the context in which the term is understood. Even though the BNP, for example, is clearly not ‘nazi’ - because nazism was a German ideology of the 1930s - associating the BNP with Nazism, and by extension the various atrocities of which the Nazis are accused, massively assists in dehumanising the BNP's members. They are portrayed not as individuals but simply as an indisputably evil collective force.
Quite apart from the ‘nazi’ label, various figures on the left use highly emotive language in referring to the BNP. Roy Hattersley termed the BNP ‘evil’ on a recent edition of Question Time. And how often has the ‘Anti-Nazi’ League been recorded chanting ‘scum’ at members of the BNP? BNP members are portrayed as not human but as ‘filth’. And there is only one logical thing to be done to filth!
The second way in which the ‘anti-nazi’ movement dehumanises its opponents is subtler. It involves deliberately alienating the BNP from those whom they wish to prevent voting for the party: the sprawling middle class. This includes just about everybody from office managers to barristers. As such, they make numerous false allegations against those they oppose. They suggest that only uneducated and often unemployed people living in deprived areas vote for the BNP. Roy Hattersley made exactly this claim on the edition of Question Time from Burnley to which I have referred, despite the fact that there were high BNP votes in many middle-class areas of Oldham, Burnley and elsewhere at the 2001 general election and in subsequent local government elections. Such an allegation cleverly manipulates the well-known phenomenon of ‘Rank Concession Syndrome’ - that people will emulate their perceived socio-economic superiors and reject the lifestyle of those they believe to be ‘failing’. Hattersley's viewers would obviously, and perhaps over-simplistically, associate unemployment with failure!
The ‘criminal’ cry
Hattersley's next argument was that many people in the BNP are ‘criminals’. This would again invoke ‘Rank Concession Syndrome’ for many of his viewers. But what he fails to point out is that most of the ‘crimes’ committed by BNP members have amounted only to breaches of the law in pursuit of political motives, sometimes involving the use of freedom of speech in a society in which freedom of speech has been a sacred national tradition (though now a ‘crime’ in certain respects). Hattersley also suggested that top BNP members have convictions for violent behaviour, again forgetting the violence against which they frequently have to defend themselves from the far left.
Hattersley's final tactic was simply to claim that if you vote BNP you have been ‘brain-washed’ by the far right and you are an ‘insecure person.’ Of course, no-one would wish to feel that either of these things applied to themselves, so that the intended effect was to alienate them from the BNP. In the process of all this, of course, Hattersley was essentially alienating many ordinary people, implying that they are incapable of having an intelligent opinion. Moreover, the refusal of politicians like Hattersley to debate with the BNP is intended only to assist this dehumanisation process further - his opponents become a dark, shadowy group with whom it is dangerous even to talk!
Projecting hatreds
The Nazis, of course, were regarded by many as projecting their own insecurities - in a time of national crisis - onto the Jews. The Jews were scapegoated for everything from unemployment to the degradation of the national character. But do not ‘anti-nazis’ project their own hatreds onto their political opponents? Recently, the ANL in Guildford used threats of violence against members of the public to cancel a BNP hustings.
We have already explored the accusations of ‘nazi’, ‘evil’, and ‘scum’ and the way in which ‘anti-nazis’ refuse to debate with their opponents but simply seek to lock them up for speaking their minds. One councillor in Wiltshire said he wouldn't want to be in the same room as a BNP member. The BNP are essentially blamed for anything for which their opponents can find to blame them. One commentator argued that racist attacks had increased in Burnley since a BNP councillor was elected. But these attacks would almost certainly have occurred regardless. Such an accusation is thus, again, scapegoating and totally irrational. The Jews were legally persecuted for their race and religion in Germany; the opponents of the ‘anti-nazis’ are persecuted for their patriotic views today. In both cases, of course, the legal system prevented, and prevents, them from fighting back.
Indeed, much of this loathing derives from the insecurities of the ‘anti-nazis’ themselves. Who are the ‘Anti-Nazi’ League?
Overwhelmingly, they are white and middle-class. They are also, in a socio-economic sense at least, failures. They do not belong to the affluent middle-class, but are mainly what they might themselves call wage-slaves: teachers, nurses and so on; and they are politically on the left. They dislike being white and British, I would suggest, because of the tremendous sense of post-colonial guilt with which today's young people have been inculcated through their education. And, needless to say, they dislike their lack of affluence, their lack of self-determination and their relative lack of achievement. The BNP, therefore, embodies all of the aspects of themselves that they despise. It is unashamedly in favour of preserving the British Nation - its culture, its own special way of life and once again ensuring that we are proud, not guilty, to be ourselves.
A great deal of the BNP's support is from honest, working-class, white people whose position reflects an aspect of the lifestyle of the ‘anti-nazi’ that he loathes. Moreover, the BNP challenges the identity of the ‘anti-nazi’ by highlighting the utter failure of his left-wing ideology to help anybody in the working-class anywhere. Even some of those in Britain's de facto underclass are likewise beginning to vote nationalist, challenging the certainties of the ‘anti- nazi’. No wonder, then, that the ‘anti-Nazi’, insecure in terms of his ideology, economic position and national identity, projects his self-loathing onto the BNP!
Violence and suppression
And like the real Nazis, the ‘anti-nazis’ are attempting to achieve a One-Party State. They use violence in place of democracy. They suppress freedom of speech. They smear and imprison their opponents. They even interfere with the democratic process by, almost unbelievably, marching against the democratically expressed will of the people and rioting in the streets, as we saw in the wake of Jean-Marie Le Pen's first-round success in the French Presidential Election. Some - such as Dutchman Volkert van der Graff - will even go as far as murdering their opponents; despite the fact that the victim in this case, Pim Fortuyn, clearly had the backing of a vast number of the Dutch electorate, van der Graff assassinated him. Many ‘anti-nazis’ will argue that they believe in freedom of speech but they still shout for the BNP to be banned!
I have even heard some ‘anti-nazis’ question whether the kind of people who vote BNP should be allowed to vote at all. One of them mooted the idea that one shouldn't be allowed to vote without a university degree. If the BNP were suppressed, Britain would effectively become a One-Party State. The three main parties are, at least in theory, agreed on the desirability of a multi-cultural society. So without the BNP where would the voice of dissent and opposition be? On many issues our so-called ‘anti-nazis’ are essentially of one voice and one party. And like the Nazis of legend, they have an absolute intolerance of anyone who dares to disagree with them.
Angus Roxburgh is quite right in one thing. The ‘politics of hate’ is indeed a significant force in modern Europe - from the left-wing fringes to the heart of the Labour Party. The hate of the ‘anti-nazi’ movement is central to modern European politics. Europe is stalked by a modern version of the nazi movement (or at least as it was perceived), which dehumanises its opponents and is so intolerant of them that it won't even debate with them. This movement uses violence, imprisonment and murder against those with whom it disagrees. And it has no respect for democracy or free speech. It scapegoats and it projects its own insecurities and hatreds onto a minority. Such a movement is dangerous, and it must be fought relentlessly. Thankfully, that fight is succeeding.
Once again freedom, democracy and pride in history and nation are on the march all over Europe, including here.
|
|
Permanent Link |
Wednesday, October 1, 2008 -6:45 PM - Well I'm speechless!
Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news
Mother kept the bodies of her
adopted girls encased in ice
and claimed child support
By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 4:52 PM on 30th September 2008
Arrested: Renee Bowmann admits beating her youngest adopted child
A mother has been arrested after the bodies of two children were discovered encased in ice in a chest freezer.
Renee Bowmann was claiming a monthly government subsidy of £1,350 for the two youngsters together with a third child discovered alive earlier. All had been adopted by Bowmann.
Sheriff's deputies were investigating an abuse complaint regarding the third, surviving child when they discovered the remains.
The mother told investigators that they had been in her southern Maryland home's freezer for at least seven months, and police said they are considering the case a homicide.
'We have reason to believe that's the two children in the freezer,' said Lt. Bobby Jones of Calvert County Sheriff's Office. 'We believe that the mother, who adopted the two children, is responsible for it.'
Post mortems would need to be completed before authorities know for sure whether it is the girls, who would be aged nine and 11.
Deputies made the gruesome find in Lusby, about 50 miles south-east of Washington.
They were at the home with a search warrant to investigate what happened to a runaway seven-year-old girl who was found wandering the neighborhood, injured and hungry in a blood- and mud-soaked nightshirt.
Bowman, 43, has been arrested,an | |