object width="425" height="350"><
Friday, January 23, 2009 -7:03 PM -
FREIGHT 88
This site is best viewed by
'Clicking on 'View' at the top of your browser
scrolling down to 'Text size' and selecting 'Largest'
after you have done this, Press key [F11]
Please scroll down for latest entries
|
|
Permanent Link |
Monday, October 20, 2008 -1:08 PM -
Everywhere people are grumbling about the way our country is being sabotaged.
But it's no good moaning if you're not prepared to play your part.
Do you love this land? Do you love your own race and its unique heritage?
Are you prepared to stand idly by and watch it all disappear under a sea of misery?
Do you wish to see it all swamped by anti-English PC dogmas and loony liberal fantasies of multiculturalism?
Then help us fight this madness - play your part - fight for England
Write to complain whenever you see an injustice; write to the offending party, write to the CRE, write to your MP, write to the papers. Information
If you agree or disagree with me, feel free to contact me at:
freight88@topmail.co.uk
IMPORTANT YOU CANNOT SEND ME AN E-MAIL BY JUST CLICKING ON THE ABOVE ADDRESS AS THE pop in Outlook is f*cked.... SO JUST COPY/ PASTE THE ABOVE ADDRESS INTO YOR OWN E-MAIL 'SEND'
THIS SITE IS BEING CONSTANTLY UP-DATED
SO PLEASE CHECK BACK OFTEN.
|
|
Permanent Link |
Sunday, August 31, 2008 -3:33 PM -
Source: http://www.uktabloid.co.uk
Reasons to NOT be Cheerful
When you read the tabloids you come across depressing news,
when you see all that is wrong below, it highlights just how disturbing the plight of the UK has really become under the Lib Lab Con regime!
|
|
Permanent Link |
Saturday, July 5, 2008 -5:55 PM - How come the Marxist femminists have f*ck all to say?
Regarding my last entry: "Sharia Law is here to stay" I wonder why these lefty feminists who say they love people of all races and believe that diversity enriches our culture have absolutally no comment about the injustices commited against women in the name of Allah?
Perhaps they quite like the idea or more likely they are too shit scared to say what they really think. Anybody who believes that we can 'Educate' Muslims to behave in a civilised manner is kidding themselves, they are missing the point. According to the Koran it is the duty of every Muslim to take over and convert to Islam every land where they reside. They have no intention of adopting western Christian ways or our culture. They simply do not belong in civilised Western Christian Countries, to them we are the infidel, the enemy. Gangs of them are attacking and raping white people all over Europe every day. Just how much longer can we be expected to put up with this Islamification of our Nation? J.H.

While we just:

|
|
Permanent Link |
Saturday, July 5, 2008 -5:05 PM - Is this what the future holds for good old Blighty?
Sharia Law is here to stay.
Given the Lord Chief Justice's support for the introduction Sharia Law, a brief reminder of what we are heading towards.
Saudi Arabia.
Click on the pics to watch:
Woman sentenced
to death for
witchcraft

18-Year-old Saudi
Rape Victim Gets
200 Lashes + Prison

Islamists : Women
should not Appear
on TV
Iranian Police
Enforces "Islamic
Dress Code"
on Women

A 16 Year Old
Iranian Girl
Executed by
Islamic Police (1 off 6)
Part one

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

Part 5

Part 6
|
|
Permanent Link |
Saturday, July 5, 2008 -3:13 PM - Giving a Billion £'s to Pakistan? Half the bastards are over here!
Source: http://isupporttheresistance.blogspot.com/
as we pay for schools
in Pakistan
Pakistani Nuclear Missile that we pay for that will one day be pointed at us
There is a bit of tiff between the forces at the moment as a £4 billion deal has been done to build two long overdue aircraft carriers for our, no bigger than a boating club, Royal Navy.
The deal also follows criticisms last week from the family of a Marine killed in Afghanistan that the Government was not properly equipping soldiers. The parents of Gary Wright, who was killed in a 2006 suicide bombing, were responding to evidence that body armour attachments had not been available until after his death.
It was also revealed only last month that plans for a new generation of 'stealth' warships are being drastically scaled back to save cash. The fleet of Type 45 destroyers, which protect other ships from air and missile attack, has been slashed from eight to six.
Now I do not know how many proper suits of body armour or proper fighting vehicles we could buy with a billion pounds to kit our troops out but I do know this.
Giving One Billion Pounds to Pakistan to build schools to tack poor literacy is not the way to go whilst our boys and girls are dying because of poor equipment. But hey, this is politics and our dhimmi leaders are sucking up the Moslem votes to keep them in power.
Please read this previous article here that shows what our money is really being spent on in Pakistan whilst our boys die and our old and sick go without medical treatment.
From Yesterday's Times:
HERE
|
|
Permanent Link |
Saturday, July 5, 2008 -12:52 PM - I'd rather have Anarchy than f*cked up Sharia law!
Source: http://www.prophet-muhammad.biz/dhimmilord.html
Current Muslim Wannabe Number 1
Mad Lord Phillips of Frontal Lobotomy
Turban of Death awarded for driving another nail into the coffin of Muslim Women's Human Rights.
It's no secret that Britain has more than its fair share of mad men at every level of its judicial system. It would appear that a severe dose of senile dementia is a pre-requisite for any junior judge with aspirations of reaching positions of real responsibility and power. Unfortunately, whilst Lord Phillips et al congratulate themselves on achieving ever increasing heights of ridiculous law-making, the rest of us have to live with the consequences.
This latest travesty has seen the country's most senior fruit-loop publicly support a decision that will make the lives of thousands of Muslim women a misery. By giving parts of Sharia law legal recognition in the UK, Muslim women will now legally be at the mercy of their husbands. In theory it should be a joint decision to go down the Sharia route, but as Muslim women are still seen as chattels to most Muslim men the decision of the husband (and other male family members) will, as always, come through.
Any sane and rational human being will see this as the thin end of the wedge. One can only hope that as the announcement was made in front of an audience of Muslims, Lord Phillips actually feared for his life should he have said anything to upset them and that he has no intention of carrying out his threat to consign Muslim women across the country to a life of servitude without hope.
A legal system based on a book which openly supports a husband 'lightly beating his disobedient wife' is highly unlikely to offer an optimistic future for any female unfortunate enough to be born into the death cult we all know as Islam.
In Lord Phillip's defence it should be noted that he ran the BSE inquiry from 1998-2000 and appears to have contracted the condition widely known as Mad Cow Disease during that time.
Get Well Soon M' Lud
|
|
|
|
Permanent Link |
Saturday, July 5, 2008 -12:21 PM - Dec 21 2012 huh? 4 years, might as well get pissed and smoke me head off!
Click on the pic to watch..... but don't get depressed

|
|
Permanent Link |
Saturday, July 5, 2008 -11:52 AM - Euro Corruption
Euro Corruption You Couldn't
Make This Up
CLICK ON THE PIC TO WATCH:

|
|
Permanent Link |
Saturday, July 5, 2008 -11:45 AM - Britainistan : A brilliant host but a shite Mother (Ta Kate)
Source: http://www.insidehousing.co.uk/news/
Priority shift for foreigners
Last updated: 04 July 2008 at 15:03 GMT
British citizens with families subject to immigration control will be entitled....
British citizens with families subject to immigration control will be entitled to priority housing if they become homeless, under a change to the Housing and Regeneration Bill.
The amendment, passed in the House of Lords last week, will apply to British, Commonwealth or European Union citizens with a foreign child or pregnant wife.
For example, a homeless British man with a non-EU nationality child will now be entitled to family housing assistance.
Speaking in the House of Lords, junior housing minister Baroness Andrews encouraged councils to use the private sector, but said social housing could be offered to 'bring the duty to an end'.
The move follows test cases which found the human rights of a British citizen were breached by the system's disregard for their family.
|
|
Permanent Link |
Saturday, July 5, 2008 -11:29 AM - Marxists are greedy bastards!
Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news
Named and shamed:
MPs who voted to keep
their generous expenses
as Brown expresses
disappointment
By Daily Mail Reporter Last updated at 3:14 PM on 04th July 2008
Gordon Brown today said he was 'disappointed' at the result of the vote on expenses in which MPs voted to carry on spending taxpayers' money on furniture and home improvements.
More than 30 senior Government figures were among the 146 Labour MPs who voted to keep their generous expenses.
They included Andy Burnham - Culture; Caroline Flint - Housing; Paul Murphy - Wales; Jacqui Smith - Home Secretary; and Shaun Woodward - Northern Ireland.
Cashing in: Home Secretary Jacqui Smith,
Culture Secretary Andy Burnham and
Housing Minister Caroline Flint
all voted not to change their expenses
The Prime Minister came under fire for ducking the vote last night in which MPs rejected moves to tighten the rules on their generous expenses. The vote came just hours after MPs had agreed to peg their pay rise back to 2.25 per cent.
Other ministers and whips who voted not to change their expenses:
Nick Brown - Deputy Chief Whip Alan Campbell - Whip Angela Eagle - Treasury Minister Maria Eagle - Ministry of Justice Beverley Hughes - Children, Schools and Families Tessa Jowell - Olympics Ivan Lewis - Health Tommy McAvoy - Whip Stephen McCabe - Whip Anne McGuire - Department for Work and Pensions Tony McNulty - Home Office Gillian Merron - International Development Mike O'Brien - DWP James Plaskitt - DWP Bridget Prentice - Ministry of Justice Gerry Sutcliffe - Sport Gareth Thomas - International Development Derek Twigg - Defence Kitty Ussher - Treasury Claire Ward - Whip Tom Watson - Cabinet Office Dave Watts - Whip Rosie Winterton -Transport Phil Woolas - Environment Iain Wright - Communities and Local Government
Vote: MPs decided to keep their 'John Lewis list' expense claim
'The Prime Minister has always made clear that he is in favour of any move that would enhance transparency,' Mr Brown's spokesman said.
He said that Mr Brown had decided not to vote himself as it became clear that the reform plans were going to be defeated.
Instead he decided to carry on working in Downing Street as it was his last working day in London before next week's G8 summit in Japan.
'There was a lot of Government business to get through,' the spokesman said.
He refused to be drawn on those ministers - as well as Mr Brown's parliamentary aides Ian Austin and Angela Smith - who voted against the changes.
'How individual MPs vote is a matter for them. MPs were voting on a free vote,' he said.
During the vote, one of the Prime Minister’s aides allegedly told Shadow Chancellor George Osborne to ‘**** off, you toff’, while Conservative leader David Cameron was embroiled in a spat with a female Labour MP.
Brown was also criticised for failing to swing his Cabinet, whose members have a basic salary of £138,000, behind the expenses clean-up.
Mr Brown's Commons aides Ian Austin and Angela Smith were among those who voted to keep their 'snouts in the trough'. They were joined by Ulster Secretary Shaun Woodward whose wife, Camilla Sainsbury, has a reported personal fortune of £100million.
The review was spearheaded by Speaker Michael Martin after a series of recent expenses controversies.
Under the planned shake-up, the second homes allowance would have been capped at £19,600 a year to cover accommodation, with a £30 daily subsistence rate.
As a result of the vote, the Additional Costs Allowance, worth £24,006 to cover the costs of living near Parliament and running a second home, stays in place. proposed ban on claims under the so-called John Lewis list was also thrown out, so MPs will continue to be free to charge iPods, dishwashers and improvements for their second homes to the public purse.
Instead of a plan for external audits on expenses claims covering up to a quarter of MPs every year, each member will face internal financial checks just once every four years.
Meanwhile, MPs backed a £6million package to improve their constituency offices, more than doubling the cost of their offices outside Westminster from £2.8million.
Inner London MPs will get a £7,500 annual allowance – up from £2,916 – while MPs representing outer London constituencies will still be able to claim the full Additional Costs Allowance, instead of it being halved as proposed.
The 'John Lewis list' is an unofficial guide used by the Parliamentary authorities to determine how much MPs may claim from the taxpayer for kitting out their second homes.
The list of 38 items is based on prices at the department store and allows MPs to claim for items including a £10,000 kitchen and a £750 TV.
Matthew Elliott, chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: 'MPs have missed a crucial opportunity to restore faith in Parliament.
The MPs who voted to keep their generous expense accounts were:
Labour Nick Ainger (Carmarthen West & Pembrokeshire South) Graham Allen (Nottingham North) David Anderson (Blaydon) Janet Anderson (Rossendale & Darwen) Ian Austin (Dudley North) Adrian Bailey (West Bromwich West) Gordon Banks (Ochil & Perthshire South) Kevin Barron (Rother Valley) Margaret Beckett (Derby South) Clive Betts (Sheffield Attercliffe Liz Blackman (Erewash) Roberta Blackman-Woods (Durham, City of) Bob Blizzard (Waveney) David Borrow (Ribble South (South Ribble) Nick Brown (Newcastle upon Tyne East & Wallsend) Richard Burden (Birmingham Northfield) Colin Burgon (Elmet), Andy Burnham (Leigh) Stephen Byers (Tyneside North) Alan Campbell (Tynemouth) Ronnie Campbell (Blyth Valley) Ben Chapman (Wirral South) David Chaytor (Bury North) Tom Clarke (Coatbridge Chryston & Bellshill) David Clelland (Tyne Bridge) Ann Clwyd (Cynon Valley) Ann Coffey (Stockport) Harry Cohen (Leyton & Wanstead) Michael Connarty (Linlithgow & Falkirk East) Rosie Cooper (Lancashire West) Ann Cryer (Keighley) John Cummings (Easington) Jim Cunningham (Coventry South) Tony Cunningham (Workington Wayne David (Caerphilly) Ian Davidson (Glasgow South West) Janet Dean (Burton) Frank Dobson (Holborn & St Pancras) Brian Donohoe (Ayrshire Central) Jim Dowd (Lewisham West) Angela Eagle (Wallasey) Maria Eagle (Liverpool Garston) Jeff Ennis (Barnsley East & Mexborough) Bill Etherington (Sunderland North) Caroline Flint (Don Valley) Paul Flynn (Newport West) Michael Foster (Worcester) Michael Jabez Foster (Hastings & Rye) Mike Gapes (Ilford South) Dr Ian Gibson (Norwich North) Linda Gilroy (Plymouth Sutton) Nia Griffith (Llanelli) Andrew Gwynne (Denton & Reddish) Mike Hall (Weaver Vale) David Hamilton (Midlothian) Dai Havard (Merthyr Tydfil & Rhymney) Stephen Hesford (Wirral West) Sharon Hodgson (Gateshead East & Washington West) Jimmy Hood (Lanark & Hamilton East) George Howarth (Knowsley North & Sefton East) Beverley Hughes (Stretford & Urmston) Joan Humble (Blackpool North & Fleetwood) Dr Brian Iddon (Bolton South East) Eric Illsley (Barnsley Central) Adam Ingram (East Kilbride, Strathaven & Lesmahagow) Brian Jenkins (Tamworth) Diana Johnson (Hull North) Kevan Jones (Durham North) Martyn Jones (Clwyd South) Tessa Jowell (Dulwich & West Norwood) Eric Joyce (Falkirk) Alan Keen (Feltham & Heston) David Kidney (Stafford) Peter Kilfoyle (Liverpool Walton) Bob Laxton (Derby North) Tom Levitt (High Peak) Ivan Lewis (Bury South) Tony Lloyd (Manchester Central) Ian Lucas (Wrexham) Tommy McAvoy (Rutherglen & Hamilton West) Stephen McCabe (Birmingham Hall Green) Christine McCafferty (Calder Valley) Kerry McCarthy (Bristol East) Sarah McCarthy-Fry (Portsmouth North) Siobhain McDonagh (Mitcham & Morden) James McGovern (Dundee West) Anne McGuire (Stirling) Shona McIsaac (Cleethorpes Rosemary McKenna (Cumbernauld, Kilsyth & Kirkintilloch East) Tony McNulty (Harrow East) Denis MacShane (Rotherham) Khalid Mahmood (Birmingham Perry Barr Rob Marris (Wolverhampton South West) Gordon Marsden (Blackpool South) Alan Meale (Mansfield) Gillian Merron (Lincoln) Andrew Miller (Ellesmere Port & Neston) Madeleine Moon (Bridgend) Jessica Morden (Newport East) Elliot Morley (Scunthorpe) George Mudie (Leeds East) Denis Murphy (Wansbeck) Paul Murphy (Torfaen) Mike O'Brien (Warwickshire North) Eddie O'Hara (Knowsley South) Sandra Osborne (Ayr, Carrick & Cumnock) James Plaskitt (Warwick & Leamington) Bridget Prentice (Lewisham East) Gordon Prentice (Pendle) Gwyn Prosser (Dover) Ken Purchase (Wolverhampton North East) Nick Raynsford (Greenwich & Woolwich) John Robertson (Glasgow North West) Terry Rooney (Bradford North) Chris Ruane (Vale of Clwyd) Christine Russell (Chester, City of) Alison Seabeck (Plymouth Devonport) Barry Sheerman (Huddersfield) Jimmy Sheridan (Paisley & Renfrewshire North) Angela C Smith (Sheffield Hillsborough) Angela E Smith (Basildon), Jacqui Smith (Redditch), Anne Snelgrove (Swindon South John Spellar (Warley) Phyllis Starkey (Milton Keynes South West) Gavin Strang (Edinburgh East), Gisela Stuart (Birmingham Edgbaston) Gerry Sutcliffe (Bradford South) Mark Tami (Alyn & Deeside) Gareth Thomas (Harrow West) Emily Thornberry (Islington South & Finsbury) Don Touhig (Islwyn) Derek Twigg (Halton) Kitty Ussher (Burnley) Keith Vaz (Leicester East) Lynda Waltho (Stourbridge) Claire Ward (Watford) Tom Watson (West Bromwich East) Dave Watts (St Helens North) Phil Wilson (Sedgefield) Rosie Winterton (Doncaster Central) Shaun Woodward (St Helens South) Phil Woolas (Oldham East & Saddleworth) David Wright (Telford) Iain Wright (Hartlepool) Derek Wyatt (Sittingbourne & Sheppey)
Conservative: David Amess (Southend West) James Arbuthnot (Hampshire North East) Henry Bellingham (Norfolk North West) Brian Binley (Northampton South) Sir John Butterfill (Bournemouth West) Christopher Chope (Christchurch) John Greenway (Ryedale) Gerald Howarth (Aldershot) Bernard Jenkin (Essex North) Julie Kirkbride (Bromsgrove) Eleanor Laing (Epping Forest) Anne McIntosh (Vale of York) Andrew Mackay (Bracknell) Andrew Rosindell (Romford) Hugo Swire (Devon East) Sir Peter Tapsell (Louth & Horncastle) Angela Watkinson (Upminster) Ann Widdecombe (Maidstone & The Weald) David Wilshire (Spelthorne) Lady Ann Winterton (Congleton), Sir Nicholas Winterton (Macclesfield)
Independent: Dai Davies (Blaenau Gwent) Robert Wareing (Liverpool West Derby)
|
|
Permanent Link |
Saturday, July 5, 2008 -11:10 AM - The Marxist theft of innocence!
Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news
Children 'to be given compulsory
sex education from age four'
By Sarah Harris Last updated at 12:40 AM on 05th July 2008
Nursery: Charities have said children
should be taught sex education
from age four
Children as young as four are set to be given compulsory sex education in primary school.
They will be taught the names of body parts and basic ideas about different relationships.
Government advisers claim that 'gradual education' from such a young age would help to stop children from rushing into sex when they are older.
They argue that the sex education that children receive in science classes does not go far enough.
But the recommendations caused a storm of protest yesterday, with family campaigners claiming that the views of parents and teachers are being ignored.
Norman Wells, director of the pressure group Family and Youth Concern, said: 'What this is really all about is the sex education establishment trying to force schools to do something many parents - and many teachers - are uncomfortable with.'
At present, primary heads and governors decide whether or not to provide sex education and what it should involve beyond the compulsory science requirements laid down by the national curriculum.
They must have a policy on whether or not they provide sex education. If they do provide it, usually in personal, social and health education (PSHE) classes, parents have the right to withdraw their children.
But the fpa - formerly the Family Planning Association - the sexual health advice service Brook and the Sex Education Forum are recommending the introduction of compulsory lessons. They are taking part in a Government review of Sex and Relationship Education (SRE) in primary and secondary schools.
The charities sit on a panel, which is currently examining 'the right age to begin teaching what the key messages are and content that young people should receive at each key stage'.
They have pre-empted publication of their final report later this month and publicly announced their recommendation for statutory sex education from primary school onwards. This would bring sex and relationship education on to the curriculum alongside other compulsory subjects such as maths and English.
Brook chief executive Simon Blake said: 'All the evidence shows that if you start sex and relationships education early - before children start puberty, before they feel sexual attraction - they start having sex later.
'They are much more likely to use contraception and practise safe sex.'
Anna Martinez, head of the Sex Education Forum, confirmed they are recommending making PSHE statutory to give it 'the high status it deserves as an essential part of all children's education'.
But Mr Wells said there is no evidence to suggest that starting sex education at the age of four would reduce sexually transmitted infections and abortion rates among teenagers.
He added: 'It's quite extraordinary that the fpa and Brook should be calling on the Government to impose something on every child in every school that has no proven benefit whatsoever.
'Schools already have to have a sex education policy, but that policy must be developed in close consultation with parents, and schools must be sensitive to the wishes of parents.
'But the fpa want to take parents out of the equation and remove discretion from schools.
'It's vital that parents' views should continue to be respected and that schools should remain sensitive to parental concerns on such a controversial issue.'
A spokesman for the Department for Children, Schools and Families insisted that no final decision has been made by ministers on the subject yet.
He said: 'Effective sex and relationships education is essential for young people to make safe and healthy choices about their lives and prevent early pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections.
'That is why Government is currently reviewing the delivery of SRE in schools to improve the quality and consistency of provision to young people.
'The steering group, jointly chaired by Schools Minister Jim Knight and a member of the UK Youth Parliament, will make recommendations to Government later this month.'
|
|
Permanent Link |
Saturday, July 5, 2008 -11:05 AM - Are the NWO behind this and whats it leading to?
Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news
Google ordered to hand over
personal details of millions
of YouTube users to Viacom
By Mail Foreign Service Last updated at 9:18 AM on 04th July 2008
Google was yesterday ordered to hand over the personal details of anyone who has ever watched a YouTube video.
The ruling - which has massive privacy implications for millions of internet users - was made as part of the search engine's legal battle with content provider Viacom over allegations of copyright infringement.
Under the ruling, Google, which bought YouTube for $1.65 billion (£820 million) in 2006, must hand over to Viacom its viewing log - which includes users' log-in information and their IP address, the code that identifies their computer.
Google must hand over the viewing details of every single
person who has watched a video on its website YouTube
Although the case is being contested in the U.S., legal experts warned last night that the ruling would almost certainly apply to YouTube users worldwide, including those in the UK. The Electronic Frontier Foundation, an internet freedom campaign group, described the judgment as a ' setback' to online privacy rights.
Viacom, which owns MTV and Paramount Pictures, has alleged that YouTube has done 'little or nothing' to stem the flow of copyrighted material on its site.
The company said it had identified more than 150,000 unauthorised clips of its content that had been uploaded.
In one case, the Al Gore documentary An Inconvenient Truth had been viewed 1.5 billion times.
However, Google claims its safeguards already exceed its legal obligations in helping content owners protect their works and says Viacom's lawsuit is a threat to internet freedom.
The search engine said it abides by the rules of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which states that as long as sites such as YouTube remove copyright content as soon as it is brought to their attention, they are protected by law from prosecution. Last night, a spokesman for Viacom tried to play down fears that individual YouTube users would be prosecuted.
'Only our legal team has access to the data,' he said. 'We are not going to use it to go after individual users.'
However, the U.S. district court in New York declined Viacom's request that Google be forced to hand over the source code of YouTube - details of how the site works - saying it is a trade secret.
Catherine Lacavera, Google's senior litigation counsel, said: 'We will ask Viacom to respect users' privacy and allow us to anonymise the logs before producing them under the court's order.'
Simon Davies, a British privacy expert, said: 'The chickens have come home to roost for Google.
'Their arrogance and refusal to listen to friendly advice has resulted in the privacy of tens of millions being placed under threat.'
A 'dangerous view' of the world
The popularity of Facebook and other social networking websites could be creating a generation of children with a potentially dangerous view of the world, doctors have warned.
They claim the fast pace of the online world means real life may appear boring and unstimulating to youngsters, leaving many with a distorted view of real life.
Some may even place less value on their lives, raising the risk of suicide, psychiatrist Himanshu Tyagi, of the West London Mental Health NHS Trust, told the Royal College of Psychiatrists' annual conference.
|
|
Permanent Link |
Saturday, July 5, 2008 -10:10 AM - Islamification of the Nation
Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news
Schoolboys punished with
detention for refusing to
kneel in class and pray to Allah
By Daily Mail Reporter Last updated at 11:30 AM on 04th July 2008
Two schoolboys were given detention after refusing to kneel down and 'pray to Allah' during a religious education lesson.
Parents were outraged that the two boys from year seven (11 to 12-year-olds) were punished for not wanting to take part in the practical demonstration of how Allah is worshipped.
They said forcing their children to take part in the exercise at Alsager High School, near Stoke-on-Trent - which included wearing Muslim headgear - was a breach of their human rights.
Alsager School, near Stoke, has received furious complaints from
parents after two Year 7 boys were punished for refusing to kneel
to Allah during a religious studies class
One parent, Sharon Luinen, said: "This isn't right, it's taking things too far.
"I understand that they have to learn about other religions. I can live with that but it is taking it a step too far to be punished because they wouldn't join in Muslim prayer.
"Making them pray to Allah, who isn't who they worship, is wrong and what got me is that they were told they were being disrespectful.
"I don't want this to look as if I have a problem with the school because I am generally very happy with it."
Another parent Karen Williams said: "I am absolutely furious my daughter was made to take part in it and I don't find it acceptable.
"I haven't got a problem with them teaching my child other religions and a small amount of information doesn't do any harm.
"But not only did they have to pray, the teacher had gone into the class and made them watch a short film and then said 'we are now going out to pray to Allah'.
"Then two boys got detention and all the other children missed their refreshment break because of the teacher.
"Not only was it forced upon them, my daughter was told off for not doing it right.
"They'd never done it before and they were supposed to do it in another language."
"My child has been forced to pray to Allah in a school lesson." The grandfather of one of the pupils in the class said: "It's absolutely disgusting, there's no other way of putting it.
"My daughter and a lot of other mothers are furious about their children being made to kneel on the floor and pray to Islam. If they didn't do it they were given detention.
"I am not racist, I've been friendly with an Indian for 30 years. I've also been to a Muslim wedding where it was explained to me that alcohol would not be served and I respected that.
"But if Muslims were asked to go to church on Sunday and take Holy Communion there would be war."
Parents said that their children were made to bend down on their knees on prayer mats which the RE teacher had got out of her cupboard and they were also told to wear Islamic headgear during the lesson on Tuesday afternoon.
Deputy headmaster Keith Plant said: "It's difficult to know at the moment whether this was part of the curriculum or not. I am not an RE teacher, I am an English teacher.
"At the moment it is our enterprise week and many of our members of staff are away.
"The particular member of staff you need to speak to isn't around. I think that it is a shame that so many parents have got in touch with the Press before coming to me.
"I have spoken to the teacher and she has articulately given me her version of events, but that is all I can give you at the moment."
A statement from Cheshire County Council on behalf of the school read: "The headteacher David Black contacted this authority immediately complaints were received.
"Enquiries are being made into the circumstances as a matter of urgency and all parents will be informed accordingly.
"Educating children in the beliefs of different faith is part of the diversity curriculum on the basis that knowledge is essential to understanding.
"We accept that such teaching is to be conducted with some sense of sensitivity."
Recaps of how the UK is being Islamified
Do they believe that attempting to turn the UK into some Islamic state will somehow remove the problems of 'No go areas? Force better integration through social engineering and remove the threat of terrorism? Or are the authorities just plain frightened what may occur if they don't appease the Islamic way of life upon us?
You make your own minds up!
(Recap from some time in 2007)
Kids Told To Write 'Allah is God'

Kids told to write 'Allah is God' UK SUN
ANGRY parents have blasted a teacher for telling ten-year-olds to copy a Muslim prayer saying “There is no God but Allah”.
Helen Green is said to have picked the Muslim call to prayer as HAND-WRITING practice.
It includes the lines “Allah is the greatest” and “I bear witness that there is no God but Allah”.
Pupil Billy Darbyshire’s stepmum Hayley Clayton said: “The explanation was that the children were learning about Islam in RE.
“But this was like he was taking an oath. A Muslim child would never be asked to write a Bible passage.
“Why didn’t she choose a passage from a normal story book to teach handwriting?”
Hayley, 23, said Mrs Green — deputy head of Newlands Primary School in Wakefield, West Yorks — had acknowledged it was a “sensitive issue” because three of the 7/7 suicide bombers came from Leeds, 15 miles away.
She added: “If it’s sensitive why choose that prayer?”
Billy’s angry dad Martin, 32, said there were no Muslims in the ten-year-old’s class. He added: “I am not religious but it offended me.
“It must have been worse for children whose parents do have different beliefs.”
Wakefield Council officials said they believed the prayer had been written for RE.

Original capture of page by
Word press Snap shots
CHRISTIANS ‘LEFT OUT AS LABOUR
FAVOURS ISLAM’
Under-fire Hazel Blears and Dr Williams
By Mark Reynolds
CHRISTIANITY is being sidelined in Britain because Labour is concentrating on minority religions such as Islam, it was claimed yesterday.
The Archbishop of Canterbury, Dr Rowan Williams, said the revelations in a new academic report were “depressing”. It claimed Labour is taking for granted the good work done by the Church of England.
It highlighted the bias towards religions such as Islam, and said the Charity Commission focused on what minority communities achieved “to the relative exclusion of the Christian church”.
The report said: “We encountered on the part of Government a significant lack of understanding of, or interest in, the Church of England’s contribution in the public sphere.
“Indeed, we were told that the Government had consciously decided to focus its evidence gathering almost exclusively on minority religions.”
Reacting to the findings, Dr Williams said: “It reveals a depressing level of misunderstanding of the scale and quality of contribution that faith-based organisations make to the civil and civic life of our nation – our common good.
“This is particularly true in relation to the contribution of the Church of England.”
The study follows controversial comments at the weekend by Communities Secretary Hazel Blears who said it was “common sense” to dedicate more effort to Islam because of the threat of extremism.
The report by the Von Hugel Institute at Cambridge University found that minority religions did not appreciate the attention lauded on them by ministers – instead feeling they were being victimised. The study also accused the Government of failing parts of society with its approach to faith communities and social policy.
| |